Reading: School of Education, The University of Reading.Ĭarroll, J. Gilbert (Ed.), Exploring models and modelling in science and technology education: contributions from the MISTRE group (pp. Towards a typology of models for science education. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.īuckley, B., Boulter, C. The philosophy of Peirce: Selected writings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), 727–737.īuchler, J. Cognitive restructuring as an early stage in problem solving. Education in Chemistry(May), 89–92.īodner, G. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(4), 257–271.īen-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silberstein, J. High-school chemistry students’ performance and gender differerences in a computerized molecular learning environment. Boulter (Eds.), Developing Models in Science Education (pp. Teaching and learning about chemistry and modelling with a computer-managed modelling system. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(4), 251–255.īarnea, N. Visual chemistry: Three-dimensional perception of chemical structures. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.īalaban, A. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. Tracing the development of models in the philosophy of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 317–337.īailer-Jones, D. Effectiveness of multimedia instruction that emphasises molecular representations on students’ understanding of chemical change. London: Routledge.Īrdac, D., & Akaygun, S. Really Raising Standards: Cognitive Acceleration and Academic Achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(1), 1–25.Īdey, P. Effects of a cognitive acceleration programme on Year 1 pupils. Interntional Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–702.Īdey, P., Robertson, A., & Venville, G. Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a critical review of the literature. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Ībd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. It is concluded that much more research and development is needed in respect of visualization in science education if its importance is to be recognised and its potential realised. Finally, some approaches to identifying students’ metavisual status are outlined and evaluated. The development of metavisual capability is discussed in both theory and practice. Without a metavisual capability, students find great difficulty in being able to undertake these demanding tasks. It is therefore argued that students -science students’ especially - must become metacognitive in respect of visualization, that they must show what I term ‘metavisual capability’. Visualization is central to learning, especially in the sciences, for students have to learn to navigate within and between the modes of representation. Models can be placed in the public arena by means of a series of ‘modes and sub-modes of representation’. As all visualization is of, and produces, models, an epistemology and ontology for models as a class of entities is presented. The range of terminology used in the field of ‘visualization’ is reviewed and, in the light of evidence that it plays a central role in the conduct of science, it is argued that it should play a correspondingly important role in science education.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |